Well, o
novo artigo do Mearls sobre o equilíbrio de entre Magias que fazem Tudo e Habilidades de Classe que eles Juram que não serão substituídas por Magias (mas obviamente, serão - It's OSR, baby). Trechos seletos:
Here’s some insight into our design process, specifically regarding how we worked to balance spellcasters against their nonspellcasting allies. Our weapon of choice was a simple priority ranking of options.
A priority ranking for D&D is a list of character option categories, such as classes and proficiencies. The priority ranking places the most important elements at the top of the list and the least important ones at the bottom. In terms of D&D’s content, classes sit at the top of the list, followed by races, spells, backgrounds, and feats.
The ranking answers the following question: What wins in a contest between option A and option B?
If my class gives me the ability to become an awesome archer, I should be a better archer than other characters whose classes give them no archery ability, but who took feats or can cast spells on themselves to gain that ability. Class is ranked higher on the list than spells or feats. Therefore, class wins....
On the other hand, something like stealth is less clear-cut. In prior editions, a wizard might use invisibility while a rogue makes a Stealth check to hide. In D&D Next, we decided that stealth and other checks are of utmost importance to the rogue—the elements that help define it as a character class. Thus, a rogue who takes stealth options within the class shouldn’t be overshadowed by the invisibility spell. A class trumps a spell.Mas, o melhor insight de porque eu acho que isso será uma furada é algo já apontado por um usuário:
Even if a class ability is more powerful than a spell, the spell can win out, as the class ability can only be chosen when the character is created or the level is gained, while a spell offers a choice during play.EDIT: Se querem um título melhor, peçam ao Kimble. É o 'dever" dele isso.
Tópico: L&L de 18/11 - The Song Remains the Shame (Lida 1127 vezes)